Home
Blog

RIRS vs URS: Surgery, Benefits & Recovery

Comparison chart of RIRS and URS procedures for kidney stone treatment in urology
RIRS vs URS: Comparing Two Leading Procedures for Kidney Stone Treatment

RIRS vs URS: A Complete Comparison of Two Urology Procedures

RIRS vs URS

Kidney and ureteral stones are not unusual urological troubles affecting millions of humans worldwide. With improvements in the clinical era, minimally invasive surgical options like RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) and URS (Ureteroscopy) have ended up as preferred treatments. But how do they vary, and which one is right for you?

In this blog, we evaluate RIRS and URS, highlighting their differences and benefits and why each procedure is favored. We’ll additionally answer often asked questions that will help you make a knowledgeable selection.

What is RIRS?

RIRS (Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery) is a procedure used to deal with kidney stones located within the kidney. It involves inserting a flexible ureteroscope via the urethra, bladder, and ureter to reach the kidney. A laser is then used to fragment the stones into tiny pieces that can be flushed out naturally through urine.

Key Features:

  • Minimally invasive
  • No external incisions
  • Suitable for stones < 2 cm within the kidney
  • Usually accomplished under preferred or spinal anesthesia

What is URS?

URS (ureteroscopy) is used to treat stones placed in the ureter, the tube connecting the kidney to the bladder. It can also deal with smaller kidney stones. A semi-rigid or bendy ureteroscope is used to attain the stone, and laser power is implemented to interrupt it.

Key Features:

  • Effective for ureteral stones
  • Can also get entry to some kidney stones
  • Minimally invasive
  • Performed beneath fashionable or spinal anesthesia

RIRS vs URS: Comparison 

RIRS is great for kidney stones beneath 2 cm with the usage of a bendy ureteroscope, while URS targets ureteral and some kidney stones with the usage of a semi-rigid or bendy scope. Both are minimally invasive, require popular or spinal anesthesia, involve short restoration (1–three days), usually want a 1-day sanatorium stay, and frequently consist of stent placement.

What process is better?

RIRS vs URS

Both RIRS and URS are powerful and safe. Preference depends on the selection of places, sizes and stones, as well as the affected person-proven elements that include anatomy or anterior surgical processes.

If the stones are kept deep inside the kidneys, select the RIRs.

Select Urs If the stone is located inside the urine conductor, or if you get entrance into the kidney, it is not necessary.

Your urologist will mainly determine the most appropriate approach based on imaging studies such as CT tests or ultrasounds.

Common questions about RIRS and URS


1. Is RIRS extra painful compared to URS?
Both techniques are at least invasive and performed under anesthesia. Sorry, after the process is usually modest and practical with the drug.

2. Each one, a stent in a while?
Yes, a temporary DJ stone can be placed after anyway to create a little simple unrestraint and recovery.

3. How soon can I go back to normal activities?
Most of the victims can resume everyday activities after 2-3 days of RIRS or URS, although heavy paintings should be postponed for a week.

4. Are there any threats or complications?
Small risks involve bleeding, pollution, and temporary discomfort in the urine. Serious complications that use experienced urologists are unusual.

5. Which is the better fulfillment fee?
Both processes have excessive performance speed when used for the best signal. RIRS is usually preferred for further complex kidney stones.

Final thoughts

Both RIRS and URS are terrible options for competing with urine stones with the need for open surgical treatment. If you suffer from kidney or ureter problems, contact the urologist to determine the correct method tailored to your condition.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *